It has hung in the night sky for four and a half billion years. Pale, cold, lifeless. Every night it watches us, and every night we watch it. People have written poems about it, spun myths, considered it a deity, and then sent the first spacecraft, stepped onto its surface, and understood that it is just a desert. But the allure of the Moon has not disappeared. It has grown stronger. Why does this dead stone attract us so? Why are we willing to spend billions to return to where we have already been? And what does the new lunar race promise — the triumph of science or a dead end of endless ambitions? Let's try to understand this cosmic attraction that cannot be explained by gravity alone.
To ancient people, the Moon was a goddess. Selene to the Greeks, Hana to the Slavs, Chang'e to the Chinese. They worshipped her, feared her, predicted fates by her. People believed that there were people living on the Moon, that its phases affected harvests and character. This was a mystery that could not be touched, but it could be deified. And in this deification was already laid the very attraction that would later turn into rockets and spacesuits.
In 1959, the Soviet station Luna-2 first reached the surface of the satellite. And in 1969, the American Apollo 11 landed on the lunar ground. Neil Armstrong said, \"A small step for a man, a giant leap for mankind.\" And that was true. We did it. We went beyond our world. But then the Apollo program was canceled, and for over fifty years, no human had set foot on the Moon.
Why? The answer is simple: it was expensive, difficult, dangerous, and it seemed unnecessary. But something changed in these fifty years. We learned to build cheaper rockets, we found water on the Moon, we understood that there are resources there. And the Moon again became attractive. Now it is not just a symbol, but a goal and perhaps a key to the future.
Modern researchers speak of the Moon as the seventh continent. Deposits of water ice have been found at its southern pole — fuel for rockets, oxygen for breathing, and water for life. There are rare earth elements that are becoming scarcer on Earth. There are unique conditions for astronomy: the absence of an atmosphere allows you to see further than from Earth. The Moon is an ideal base for observing space. And perhaps it will become a launching pad for flights to Mars.
The NASA Artemis program is not just \"another landing.\" It is the creation of a long-term infrastructure on the Moon: a base at the southern pole, lunar modules, an orbiting station Gateway. China, together with Russia, is building the International Scientific Lunar Station. Private companies such as SpaceX and Blue Origin are preparing their missions. The Moon is becoming a point of intersection of state and private interests. This is no longer a race for prestige, but an economic and strategic necessity.
Moreover, the Moon is a scientific laboratory. There, in conditions of low gravity, experiments can be conducted that cannot be reproduced on Earth: study the behavior of materials, biological systems, physical processes. This may lead to breakthroughs in materials science, medicine, energy. The Moon is not the end of the road, but the beginning.
The new landing will be different. In 1969, we had three days on the Moon, and all we could do was collect rocks and plant a flag. Today we have robots, 3D printing, artificial intelligence, ion thrusters. We can build bases from lunar soil, extract water, use solar energy. We can stay on the Moon for months and then send expeditions further.
The Artemis program provides for a landing on the southern pole. This will not just be \"visit,\" but \"stay.\" First for a few days, then for weeks, then for months. By the 2030s, it is planned to create a livable base where you can live and work. This sounds like science fiction, but it is a real plan. Technologies allow it. All that remains is political will and funding.
However, there are also challenges. Prolonged stay in low gravity is harmful to health. Radiation on the Moon is 200 times stronger than on Earth. Dust, which settles on equipment, is abrasive and toxic. Psychological loads of isolation. All this will have to be addressed. But it is precisely these challenges that make the mission interesting — we are not just going where we have already been, we are going where we will solve fundamentally new tasks.
There is also another reason — romantic. We are a species that looks up at the sky. This is embedded in us by evolution. We cannot not look at the stars, not dream of what is beyond them. The Moon is the nearest goal that gives us hope that we will not sit on Earth forever. It is a symbol that we can overcome our limits. It brings us back the feeling of adventure that is missing in a world where everything is already open and explored.
Psychologists call this the \"view effect\" — when cosmonauts, looking at Earth from space, feel the unity of humanity and existential shivers. The Moon gives this effect even to those who observe it from Earth. It reminds us of the scale of the Universe and our place in it. And this is no less important than scientific discoveries.
Moreover, the Moon is a platform for inspiration. A new generation grew up with stories about Apollo, but never saw a landing. The new era of lunar expeditions can give them their own \"story,\" their own myth. This is important for culture, education, spirit. Because without dreams, we stop moving forward.
If the plans are realized, then we will see the first \"cities\" on the Moon in this decade — modular bases where scientists, engineers, and even the first space tourists will live and work. SpaceX and other companies are already selling tickets to low Earth orbit, and in a few years they will offer tours to the Moon. It will be expensive, but it will be. The Moon will no longer be a place for chosen heroes — it will become a place for all who have the desire and means.
Lunar industry is also not far off. The mining of helium-3, which can be used for thermonuclear fusion, may become an energy breakthrough. The mining of rare metals is an economic stimulus. Building telescopes on the far side of the Moon is a scientific breakthrough. This is not futurology, this is the nearest prospects. The question is not \"if,\" but \"when.\"
Of course, there are also risks. Militarization of space, contamination of the lunar environment, unfair distribution of resources. But these risks are not a reason to give up on the dream, but a reason to make it right. International agreements such as the Outer Space Treaty already regulate the use of the Moon. New laws may appear to ensure peaceful settlement.
The allure of the Moon is not only physics. It is psychology, history, culture, and future. It attracts us because it is our nearest goal, our springboard into the vast cosmos. The new landing is not a repetition of 1969, but the beginning of a new era where the Moon will become not just a point on the map, but a home for science, industry, and even art.
We will return to the Moon not because we have been there before, but because we have not lived there yet. We will return to learn to live outside Earth, to understand how we are structured, to find answers to questions we have not even learned to ask. And in this return, there is nothing more human than the desire to look up and go where curiosity calls us. The Moon awaits. And we are going.
New publications: |
Popular with readers: |
News from other countries: |
![]() |
Editorial Contacts |
About · News · For Advertisers |
U.S. Digital Library ® All rights reserved.
2014-2026, LIBMONSTER.COM is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map) Keeping the heritage of the United States of America |
US-Great Britain
Sweden
Serbia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Tajikistan
Estonia
Russia-2
Belarus-2