In 1803, Thomas Jung directed a beam of light onto an opaque screen with two slits. Instead of the expected two streaks of light on the projection screen, he saw several streaks, as if two waves of light were interfering from each slit.
Over the course of two centuries, many experiments have been performed that have shown that not only light, but any single elementary particle and even some molecules behave like a wave, passing through both slits at the same time.
The Standard Model of physics considers four fundamental interactions: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong, and weak. But in objective reality there is also a magnetic interaction, which propagates through magnetic charges, which are called gravitons.
Gravitons are mini vortices of ether, magnetic dipoles and bricks of matter. The energy of the vortex generates a unidirectional movement of the ether between the poles, as a result of which the ether is absorbed by one pole and thrown out by the opposite pole. This is how the forces that we call magnetic forces are formed.
Einstein's mistakes originate from his famous question: “The focus of the whole discussion is the question: are there physically distinguishable (privileged) states of motion in nature?”
The author of the article did not encounter a single source on the Meissner-Oxenfeld effect, where the version that this effect is explained by the presence of eddy currents in superconducting ceramics would be questioned.
But, in the opinion of the author of the article, ceramics in such a state are surrounded by such gravitational fields, which, when cooled, turn into gravimagnetic fields, which, together with the gravimagnetic fields of the Earth, pull all the magnetic fields from the ceramics body.
The article gives my short life story with a list of my discoveries.
May the terrible moralists forgive me, I call these hypotheses discoveries because their logical connectedness and conformity with the materialistic dialectic of thinking does not allow to doubt that truth has been found here.
Awareness of man himself, the birth of the human “I” occurred through a qualitative leap in the process of evolution of the population of brain giants, which appeared as a result of crossing Homo sapiens with Neanderthals.
istory make the masses. But the masses are ruled by leaders.
The influence of an individual on the development of social processes is the greater, the greater the influence this personality has on the consciousness of individuals, as well as on the social consciousness of groups, classes and nations.
The formula of Marx's social progress — the developing productive forces of society outgrow their production relations, throw them off and give birth to new ones — true, but only with Lenin's amendment: man is the main productive force of humanity.
The fundamental difference between a herd of animals and a human society is the presence of social laws formed by the consciousness of people in human society.
Anthroposociogenesis is the process of forming into the consciousness of hominids of social laws, through the indefinite and combinational variability of genotypes with the elimination of those hominids that are not capable of subjecting their activity to laws.
Comparing all that is united by the concept of "mine" with all that is united by the concept of "not mine" the concept of "I" is born. Here begins the development of the individual consciousness of modern man, here began the development and individual consciousness of fossil people. It also began its development and public power, which initially could not have any other form, as soon as the form of protection of a mother who realized her motherhood to her children.
Both individual consciousness and public power originate in the form of legal consciousness, and, first of all, in the form of awareness of the issues of belonging of certain objects to certain individuals, that is, in the form of awareness of the concepts "mine is not mine", "my child is not my child".
Dialectics is often called the tool of knowledge of nature. But, in the opinion of the author of this article, this tool is still as imperfect as the scissors would be imperfect, without the central screw uniting the two blades of this tool.
This "cog" in dialectics is the fact that the "struggle" of opposites, which is the driving force behind the development of all processes of nature, is not absolute.
"Struggle" is born when the dialectic system deviates from the state of equilibrium, and the goal of this "struggle" is to restore the lost equilibrium of the system.
Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, studying the physiological process, which he called the conditioned reflex, suggested that this process is the basis for the formation of mental reactions of all living organisms, including the thinking process of a human of a modern species.
But, in our opinion, the human thinking process of the modern species is based not on one, but on four types of conditioned reflexes.
About two and a half thousand years ago, Zenon of Elea tried to draw the attention of researchers to how important it is (adequately to reality) to define the concepts that are used in the description of certain processes.
But, apparently, his attempts were in vain, for the researchers, and still do not pay enough attention to the definition of basic concepts in the description, in particular, physical processes.
IA ray of light, refracted by a glass prism, splits into multicolored rays. And it is this set of rays that forms what we call sunlight.
Thus, light is a set of multi-colored photons. And the photon itself is a quantum of one or another color.
In addition to the valence, which connects the atoms into molecules, there is a valence that connects the nucleons to each other.