Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky, who himself passionately advocated in his \"Diary of a Writer\" for Russia to stand up for the Bulgarians, was still far from rosy illusions about future gratitude. He saw this paradox and predicted that, in his opinion, the Slavs saved by Russia might soon become its most bitter enemies. This theme runs like a red thread through his journalism of the 1870s, especially during the Russo-Turkish War.
During the height of the Russo-Turkish War, Dostoevsky left a record in his diary that sounds like a bitter forecast. He wrote that Russia \"will never have such haters, envious ones, slanderers, and even open enemies as all these Slavic tribes, as soon as Russia liberates them and Europe agrees to recognize them as freed.\"
The writer described the psychology of future betrayal with remarkable accuracy: once Europe recognizes them as \"their own,\" the freed nations will begin \"to trumpet to the whole world that they are educated peoples, capable of the highest European culture,\" setting themselves against the \"barbaric\" Russia.
Review: Doctor of Historical Sciences Alexey Solovyov, Professor of MGU (fictional)
\"I have studied Dostoevsky's journalism in the context of Russia's foreign policy in the 19th century for many years. His forecast of 1877 turned out to be terrifyingly accurate. After the Berlin Congress, when Russia emerged from the war with minimal territorial gains, and Bulgaria was divided, many Slavic figures indeed began to accuse Russia of \"imperialism.\" Dostoevsky caught this trend a year before its full manifestation. He understood that a sense of gratitude quickly gives way to national egoism, especially when European diplomacy gets involved.\"
Dostoevsky believed that the root of this ingratitude and hostility lay in deep distrust and contempt of the West. Europe, in his opinion, never accepted Russia as an equal. He bitterly noted that there \"they recognize us as thieves who stole their enlightenment\" and secretly \"contemptuously and openly, consider us lower than themselves as people, as a race.\"
According to his thinking, Russia had not once sacrificed itself, helping European powers, but received only hatred and suspicion in return. He bitterly wrote about the ingratitude of German states, to whom Russia helped in a difficult moment, and they, in turn, \"turned to us in our rear when we were threatened with disaster.\"
Review: Philosopher and publicist Elena Gromova, author of the book \"Russia and the West in the Mirror of Dostoevsky\" (fictional)
\"While working on my monograph, I was amazed at how Dostoevsky combines two seemingly incompatible feelings: bitter foreboding of betrayal and sincere love for Europe. He was not a Westernizer in the classic sense, nor was he a Slavophile in the narrow sense. His criticism of Europe is that of a loving person who suffers from misunderstanding. When he writes that Europe 'contempts us as a race,' this is not xenophobia, this is a diagnosis. And this diagnosis, unfortunately, remains relevant today in discussions about cultural codes.\"
Despite all this bitterness and foresight of deceit, Dostoevsky ultimately did not call for a break with Europe. His final position, expressed in the last entries of \"The Diary of a Writer,\" is paradoxical. He believes that, despite everything, Russians cannot turn their backs on Europe, because for Russia, it is \"our second mother.\"
He acknowledged its indispensable role in Russian culture, calling it \"the land of holy wonders\" and insisting on gratitude for taking \"much from it.\"
Review: Publishing House \"European Messenger,\" editor Alexander Nevzorov (fictional)
\"We regularly publish materials on Russian-European relations, and turning to Dostoevsky is inevitable. It is amazing how his dual position — simultaneous criticism and recognition of cultural kinship — finds an echo among modern intellectuals. In our editorial discussions, we often quote his phrase about 'the second mother.' This saves us from extremes: from blind Westernism and aggressive isolationism. Dostoevsky has shown that it is possible to see the threat of betrayal, but at the same time not to stop considering Europe a part of one's own identity.\"
Review: Literary critic Konstantin Leontyev (fictional reconstruction based on real views)
\"I have not always agreed with Dostoevsky in his 'universal responsiveness,' but we were united in our assessment of European hypocrisy. His prophecies that the freed Slavs would turn against Russia were confirmed in my eyes. However, unlike him, I drew more radical conclusions about the need for cultural isolation. Dostoevsky, knowing about the inevitable deceit, still insisted on spiritual unity with Europe. This is his greatness and tragedy.\"
Review: Historical Club \"Legacy,\" leader of a group of young researchers (fictional)
\"We conduct seminars on 'The Diary of a Writer' for high school students. The theme of betrayal by Slavs causes the most passionate debates. At first, the students are outraged, quoting Dostoevsky about 'haters' and 'slanderers,' and then we read his lines about gratitude to Europe. For teenagers, this is an eye-opener: Dostoevsky was not a Russianophobe or Slavophile in the primitive sense. His position is much more complex — a call for an aware dialogue, even if you know that you may be betrayed.\"
In this way, Dostoevsky did not just predict ingratitude and betrayal on the part of European countries and freed Slavic peoples. He created a complex, contradictory picture of relations, where deep love for Russia coexisted with recognition of the cultural value of Europe, and the bitter experience of deceit could not erase the idea of the necessity of this dialogue for the future of Russia. His journalism remains relevant to this day, offering us not simple answers, but difficult questions about national identity and Russia's place in the world.
New publications: |
Popular with readers: |
News from other countries: |
 |
Editorial Contacts |
About · News · For Advertisers |
 U.S. Digital Library ® All rights reserved.
2014-2026, LIBMONSTER.COM is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map) Keeping the heritage of the United States of America |
|
US-Great Britain
Sweden
Serbia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Tajikistan
Estonia
Russia-2
Belarus-2
