In his remarkable treatise The New Organon, Francis Bacon insisted on empiricism, which would lay the foundations for a new axiomatics. In the year 1627. We treat with piety the treatise and many attempts to come to new ways of comprehending the Divine essence. To know something Great through particulars is an arch-complex Task. Such attempts can delight many mature intellectual communities in their entirety. What happens in the end. The bearded scientific community has trampled the Mother Church from world governance, and has stood in an empty place. It’s all axiomatic. What's possible. What should. What is science. What is not? Et cetera. On all continents, a certain primacy of correct (correct) Knowledge and scientific traditions was established for the sake of understanding the “Law of Nature”. Bravo..! The amazing inquiry of the scientific brethren from the Celestial Empire not so long ago put the Founding Fathers into a fruitless impasse. At one of their scientific conferences, a question was asked: And who said that Nature is subject to certain Laws? Joining our Chinese brethren in mind. And really, who? We are like a young cook’s assistant tasting the coastal ocean water with a teaspoon and marveling at the absence or presence of cetaceans. The ocean for vines is extremely vast and the spoon, as a toolkit, is too small. We have investigated one quadrillionth of a percent of Matter and Chronos, and have declared certain Knowledge and rules. Thank the gods that the Theater of Machines and Mechanisms has been created, that the turbine of a nuclear reactor rotates and a kind of gas burner flies into near space. It will be small. It is time to write the Newest Organon. All tasks are done. Absolutely everything. What tasks do we have to carry out in the near future XXI Millennium is the question.... Criteria — “works or does not work” Glory”! But these are infantile criteria. They’re being replaced century after century. If we can’t learn today, we’ll learn to ... Read more