Libmonster is the largest world open library, repository of author's heritage and archive

Register & start to create your original collection of articles, books, research, biographies, photographs, files. It's convenient and free. Click here to register as an author. Share with the world your works!

share the publication with friends & colleagues

Избранная библиография

1. Benevich Gr. Мать Сыра-Земля и геополитика (свертывание плоскостей Федора Достоевского) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 3 - 13.

2. Blumenkrants M. Эсхатологическая проблема в творчестве Ф. М. Достоевского // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 15 - 20.

3. Boyce Gibson A. The Religion of Dostoevski. London, 1973.

4. Boyce Gibson A. The Riddle of the Grand Inquisitor // Melbourne Slavonic Studies. 1970. N 4. P. 46 - 56.

5. Christa B. "Money Talks": The Semiotic Anatomy of "Krotkaia" // Dostoevsky Studies. 2000. N 4. P. 143 - 151.

6. Christa B. Dostoevskii and Money // The Cambridge Companion to Dostoevskii / Ed. W.J. Leatherbarrow. Cambridge, 2002. P. 93 - 110.

7. Christa B. Raskolnikov's Wardrobe: Dostoevsky's Use of Vestimentary Markers for Literary Communication in "Crime and Punishment" // Dostoevsky on the Threshold of Other Worlds: Essays in Honour of Malcolm V. Jones / Eds. S. Young and L. Milne. Ilkeston, Derbyshire, 2006. P. 14 - 20.

8. Christa B. The Semiotic Depiction of Disintegration of Personality in Dostoevsky's "The Double" // XXI vek glazami Dostoevskogo - perspektivy chelovechestva: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, sostoiavsheisia v Universitete Tiba (Iaponiia), 22 - 25 avgusta 2000 goda / Ed. K. Stepaman. Moskva, 2002. S. 221 - 250.

9. Christa B. Vestimentary Markers as an Element of Literary Communication in "The Brothers Karamazov" // "Die Bruder Karamasow": Dostojewskijs letzter Roman in heutiger Sicht. Dresden, 1997. S.89 - 103.

10. Cope J. Shaking off the Old Skin: The Redemptive Motif in Ellison's "Invisible Man" and Dostoevsky's "Notes from the Underground" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 75 - 91.

11. Fateeva N.A. Действительно ли Достоевский диалогичен? (о диалогичности и интертекстуальности "Отчаяния") //The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 119 - 135.

стр. 474

12. Fusso S. "Secrets of Art" and "Secrets of Kissing": Towards a Poetics of Sexuality in Dostoevskii // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 47 - 58.

13. Gelhard D. Das Prinzip der Partizipation am fremden Text in Dostoevskijs "Bobok" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 113 - 122.

14. Gerigk H. -J. Versuch tiber Dostoevskijs "Jungling": Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Romans. Munchen, 1965 (Forum Slavicum; Bd. 4 / Ed. D. Tschizewskij).

15. Grishin D. The Beliefs of Dostoevsky. Melbourne, 1963 (Twentieth Century; 1963; Vol. 17).

16. Grishin D. V. Афоризмы и высказывания Достоевского. Melbourne, 1961.

17. Katsman R. Dostoevsky's "A Raw Youth": Mythopoesis as the Dialectics of Absence and Presence (From Capital to Writing) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 85 - 95.

18. Kholodov A.B. Мифопоэтика романов Ф. М. Достоевского: диалог и контекст // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 137 - 147.

19. Kravchenko M. Dostoevsky and the Psychologists. Amsterdam, 1978.

20. Lane D. A Reading of Dostoevsky's "The Double" through the Psychoanalytic Concepts of The Self and The Other // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 1 - 11.

21. Mathews P.D. That Which Exceeds // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3-4. P. 67 - 78.

22. Mathews P., Cooke B. Dostoevsky: Expressions in Silence // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 1 - 9.

23. Melbourne Slavonic Studies. Dostoevsky Commemorative Number / Ed. S. B. Vladiv. 1980. N 14. 100 p.

24. Minney P. Dostoevsky's Dialogic Imagination and the British School of Radical Orthodoxy // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 55 - 61.

25. Nogovitsin O. Зло в христианстве и бунт Ивана Карамазова // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 63 - 72.

26. Padgett A. Beyond Dostoevsky: The Discourse of Non-Existence // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 79 - 91.

27. Rusniak L. A. Мифологическое мышление в диалогической структуре текста Достоевского ("Братья Карамазовы") // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 73 - 85.

28. Saraskina L. V. Ф. М. Достоевский и "восточный вопрос" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 87 - 102.

29. Schmid W. Der Textaufbau in den Erzahlungen Dostoevskijs. Munchen, 1973 (Beiheft zu Poetica; h. 10 / Ed. K. Maurer).

стр. 475

30. Stepanian K. A. Смерть и воскресение, бытие и небытие в романах Достоевского // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 103 - 117.

31. Stuchebryukhova O. The Subaltern Syndrome and Dostoevsky's Quest for Authenticity of Being // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 13 - 32.

32. Terrell N. Soap Bubbles and Inertia: The Underground Man's Dependence on Rhetoric, Narrative Frameworks and Scepticism as a Syndrome of Secular Idealism // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 1 - 29.

33. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review/Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2000. Vol. 1. 166 p. (Inaugural Issue.)

34. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2001. Vol. 2. 152 p. (Special Issue: Dostoevsky and the Problem of Dialogue in Contemporary European Thought / Guest Ed. N. Pecherskaya).

35. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review/Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. 228 p.

36. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review /Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2005. Vol. 5. 216 p.

37. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S. M. Vladiv-Glover. 2005. Vol. 6. 109 p.

38. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S. M. Vladiv-Glover. 2006. Vol. 7. 106 p.

39. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2007/2008. Vol. 8 - 9. 89 p.

40. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2009/2010. Vol. 10 - 11. 104 p.

41. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review/Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2011/2012. Vol. 12 - 13. 155 p.

42. Vladiv S. B. Dostoevsky's Major Novels as Semiotic Models // Dostoevsky Studies. 1989. Vol. 9. P. 157 - 162.

43. Vladiv S.B. Narrative Principles in Dostoevskij's "Besy": A Structural Analysis. Berne; Frankfurt am Mein; Las Vegas, 1979.

44. Vladiv S. Religious Imagery in Dostoevsky's Works // Australian Slavonic and East European Studies. 1988. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 95 - 110.

45. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Dostoevsky, Freud and Parricide: Deconstructive Notes on "The Brothers Karamazov" // New Zealand Slavonic Journal. 1993. P. 7 - 34.

46. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Dostoevsky's Major Novels as Models of Meaning // Dostoevsky Studies (Journal of the International Dostoevsky Society). 1989. Vol. 9. N 1. P. 157 - 162.

47. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Dostoevsky's Positively Beautiful Man and the Existentialist Authentic Self: A Comparison // Canadian American Slavic Studies. 1989. Vol. 23. N 3 (Fall 1989). P. 313 - 329.

стр. 476

48. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Romani Dostojevskog kao diskurs transgresijc i pozude. Belgrade, 2001. 215 p.

49. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Russia's Political Unconscious in "The Possessed": Dostoevsky's New Phenomenology of History and Representation // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 11 - 28.

50. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Сакральное в "Братьях Карамазовых": вероисповедание или феноменология сознания? // Достоевский и мировая культура: Альманах. 1999. Т. 12. С. 7 - 12.

51. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Speech and Being in "The Brothers Karamazov" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 93 - 112.

52. Vladiv-Glover S.M. The Accidental Family in "The Adolescent" and Wittgenstein's "Family Relations": The Novel as Model of Meaning // Aspects of Dostoevsky's Poetics in the Context of Literary-Cultural Dialogues / Eds. K. Kroo, G.S. Horvath, T. Szabo. Sankt-Petersburg, 2011. P. 59 - 74. (Dostoevsky Monographs Series; Vol. 3).

53. Vladiv-Glover S. M. The Body and Violence: The Subject of Knowledge in Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" // Foucault: The Legacy / Ed. by С O'Farrell. Brisbane, 1997. P. 46 - 57.

54. Vladiv-Glover S.M. The Bourgeois and Citizen Alyosha Karamazov // Australian Slavonic and East European Studies (ASEES). 1996. Vol. 10. N2. P. 165 - 167.

55. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Poetika realizma: Dostojevski, Flober, Tolstoj / Transl. into Serbian. Belgrade, 2010. 182 p.

56. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Tolstoy's Mikhailov, The Painter of Anna's Portrait, and Constatin Guys, Baudelaire's Painter of Modern Life // Facta Universitatis. Series Linguistics and Literature. 2005. Vol. 3. N 2. P. 151 - 160.

57. Vladiv-Glover S.M. What Does Ivan Karamazov "Know"? A Reading through Foucault's Analytic of the "Clinical" Gaze // Polyfunktion und Metaparodie: Aufsatze zum 175. Geburtstag von Fedor Michailovic Dostojevskij / Ed. R. Neuhauser. Dresden; Munchen, 1998. S. 189 - 207. (Dostoevsky Studies Supplements; Vol. 1).

58. Vladiv-Glover S. M. What Does Ivan Karamazov "Know"? A Reading through Foucault's Analytic of the "Clinical" Gaze // New Zealand Slavonic Journal. 1995. P. 23 - 44.

59. Woodford M. Комментарий к сну главного героя в рассказе Ф. М. Достоевского "Господин Прохарчин" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 21 - 36.

60. Zhivolupova N. V Другой в художественном сознании Достоевского и проблема эволюции исповеди антигероя // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 37 - 53.

61. Zink A. What is Prostitution Good for: Dostoevsky, Chernyshevsky, Tolstoy and the "Woman Question" in Russian Literature // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 93 - 106.

стр. 477

62. Гришин Д. В. "Дневник писателя" Достоевского. Мельбурн, 1966.

63. Гришин Д. В. Ранний Достоевский. Мельбурн, б. д. 230 с.

64. Гришин Д. Достоевский: Человек - Писатель и Мифы. Мельбурн, 1971.

65. Живолупова Н. Исповедь антигероя: от Достоевского к Михаилу Агееву (проблема жанра) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 1 - 30.

66. Кайман Р. Между Письмом и Документом, или Критические Заметки о Жизни Знаков в "Подростке" Достоевского // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 59 - 66.

67. Тарасова Н. А. Проблема установления текста "Дневника писателя" Ф. М. Достоевского 1876 г. // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 31-45.

68. Тарасова Н. А. Проблема понимания в герменевтике и текстологии (на материале рукописей Достоевского) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 33 - 46.

Orphus

© libmonster.com

Permanent link to this publication:

http://libmonster.com/m/articles/view/ИЗУЧЕНИЕ-ТВОРЧЕСТВА-ДОСТОЕВСКОГО-В-АВСТРАЛИИ-1971-2013

Similar publications: LRussia LWorld Y G


Publisher:

Libmonster OnlineContacts and other materials (articles, photo, files etc)

Author's official page at Libmonster: http://libmonster.com/Libmonster

Find other author's materials at: Libmonster (all the World)GoogleYandex

Permanent link for scientific papers (for citations):

С. ВЛАДИВ-ГЛОВЕР, ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ТВОРЧЕСТВА ДОСТОЕВСКОГО В АВСТРАЛИИ (1971-2013) // London: Libmonster (LIBMONSTER.COM). Updated: 03.12.2017. URL: http://libmonster.com/m/articles/view/ИЗУЧЕНИЕ-ТВОРЧЕСТВА-ДОСТОЕВСКОГО-В-АВСТРАЛИИ-1971-2013 (date of access: 31.05.2020).

Found source (search robot):


Publication author(s) - С. ВЛАДИВ-ГЛОВЕР:

С. ВЛАДИВ-ГЛОВЕР → other publications, search: Libmonster United KingdomLibmonster WorldGoogleYandex

Comments:



Reviews of professional authors
Order by: 
Per page: 
 
  • There are no comments yet
Publisher
Libmonster Online
New-York, United States
491 views rating
03.12.2017 (910 days ago)
0 subscribers
Rating
0 votes

Keywords
Related Articles
Социальное пространство – топовая тема нынешних гуманитарных наук, поскольку пространство, по М. Кастельсу, и есть выражение общества. Социальное пространство, пребывая в пространстве физическом, в отличие от него, уже сформировавшегося, предопределяется и создается мыследеятельностной энергийностью людей, само воздействуя на них. Оно становится цивилизационным домом человеческого бытия, вариантная архитектоника которого закладывается в неких исходных «проектных решениях», не поддающихся легкому осмыслению.
Catalog: Philosophy 
12 days ago · From Alexander Ralchuk
And they, electrons and positrons, are the quanta of the EM wave. This fact is clearly proved by artificial EM waves, where in the receiving antennas the EM wave generates electron-positron EMF. EMF photons cannot form.
Catalog: Physics 
61 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
No one doubts the existence of the electronic current, and there is no need to prove it, although the theory of alternating current, based on the assumption that electrons can run in one direction and then in the reverse direction, is clearly erroneous and requires a refutation. To prove the existence of a positron current, it is sufficient to pass the current rectified by the semiconductor bridge through the frame of the magnetoelectric galvanometer in one direction and then in the opposite direction. Both currents will deflect the arrow towards the south pole of the magnet, which corresponds to the charge of the positron.
Catalog: Physics 
71 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
These errors of the modern theory of electricity are connected with the fact that only now physical science, and first of all, quantum physics, began to clarify the nature of the charges of electrons and positrons. It turned out that there are no specific electric charges in nature, because an electron - by 2/3 of its volume - is a magnetic dipole of the north pole, called a minus, and a positron is a magnetic dipole of the south pole, called a plus. Each charge generates 1/3 of the volume of the magnetic induction of the opposite pole. Moreover, a larger magnetic charge is considered an electric charge, and a smaller magnetic charge is considered to be the magnetic component of the charges, which, when current flows in the conductor, generates speraloid lines of magnetic induction.
Catalog: Physics 
81 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
In the modern theory of electricity, the conduction current is considered to be the current of free electrons. And the theory of alternating current is based on the assumption that electrons can change the direction of motion in the opposite direction. The fallacy of these theories is revealed if we consider the operation of alternators with a grounded neutral conductor, as is done in all industrial electrical installations.
Catalog: Physics 
86 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
Einstein's mistakes originate from his famous question: “The focus of the whole discussion is the question: are there physically distinguishable (privileged) states of motion in nature?”
Catalog: Physics 
125 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
БАЛКАНСКИЙ ВОПРОС ВО ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКЕ ВЕЛИКОБРИТАНИИ (1908-1912 годы)
Catalog: Political science 
125 days ago · From Libmonster Online
XXI МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ КОНГРЕСС ИСТОРИЧЕСКИХ НАУК В АМСТЕРДАМЕ
Catalog: History 
125 days ago · From Libmonster Online
БРИТАНСКИЕ ТОРИ: ВОЗРОЖДЕНИЕ ИЛИ УГАСАНИЕ?
Catalog: Political science 
125 days ago · From Libmonster Online
М. О. Трояновская. ДИСКУССИИ ПО ВОПРОСАМ ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКИ В США (1775-1823)
Catalog: Political science 
125 days ago · From Libmonster Online

ONE WORLD -ONE LIBRARY
Libmonster is a free tool to store the author's heritage. Create your own collection of articles, books, files, multimedia, and share the link with your colleagues and friends. Keep your legacy in one place - on Libmonster. It is practical and convenient.

Libmonster retransmits all saved collections all over the world (open map): in the leading repositories in many countries, social networks and search engines. And remember: it's free. So it was, is and always will be.


Click here to create your own personal collection
ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ТВОРЧЕСТВА ДОСТОЕВСКОГО В АВСТРАЛИИ (1971-2013)
 

Support Forum · Editor-in-chief
Watch out for new publications:

About · News · Reviews · Contacts · For Advertisers · Donate to Libmonster

Libmonster ® All rights reserved.
2014-2020, LIBMONSTER.COM is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map)


LIBMONSTER - INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY NETWORK