Libmonster is the largest world open library, repository of author's heritage and archive

Register & start to create your original collection of articles, books, research, biographies, photographs, files. It's convenient and free. Click here to register as an author. Share with the world your works!

share the publication with friends & colleagues

Избранная библиография

1. Benevich Gr. Мать Сыра-Земля и геополитика (свертывание плоскостей Федора Достоевского) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 3 - 13.

2. Blumenkrants M. Эсхатологическая проблема в творчестве Ф. М. Достоевского // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 15 - 20.

3. Boyce Gibson A. The Religion of Dostoevski. London, 1973.

4. Boyce Gibson A. The Riddle of the Grand Inquisitor // Melbourne Slavonic Studies. 1970. N 4. P. 46 - 56.

5. Christa B. "Money Talks": The Semiotic Anatomy of "Krotkaia" // Dostoevsky Studies. 2000. N 4. P. 143 - 151.

6. Christa B. Dostoevskii and Money // The Cambridge Companion to Dostoevskii / Ed. W.J. Leatherbarrow. Cambridge, 2002. P. 93 - 110.

7. Christa B. Raskolnikov's Wardrobe: Dostoevsky's Use of Vestimentary Markers for Literary Communication in "Crime and Punishment" // Dostoevsky on the Threshold of Other Worlds: Essays in Honour of Malcolm V. Jones / Eds. S. Young and L. Milne. Ilkeston, Derbyshire, 2006. P. 14 - 20.

8. Christa B. The Semiotic Depiction of Disintegration of Personality in Dostoevsky's "The Double" // XXI vek glazami Dostoevskogo - perspektivy chelovechestva: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, sostoiavsheisia v Universitete Tiba (Iaponiia), 22 - 25 avgusta 2000 goda / Ed. K. Stepaman. Moskva, 2002. S. 221 - 250.

9. Christa B. Vestimentary Markers as an Element of Literary Communication in "The Brothers Karamazov" // "Die Bruder Karamasow": Dostojewskijs letzter Roman in heutiger Sicht. Dresden, 1997. S.89 - 103.

10. Cope J. Shaking off the Old Skin: The Redemptive Motif in Ellison's "Invisible Man" and Dostoevsky's "Notes from the Underground" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 75 - 91.

11. Fateeva N.A. Действительно ли Достоевский диалогичен? (о диалогичности и интертекстуальности "Отчаяния") //The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 119 - 135.

стр. 474

12. Fusso S. "Secrets of Art" and "Secrets of Kissing": Towards a Poetics of Sexuality in Dostoevskii // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 47 - 58.

13. Gelhard D. Das Prinzip der Partizipation am fremden Text in Dostoevskijs "Bobok" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 113 - 122.

14. Gerigk H. -J. Versuch tiber Dostoevskijs "Jungling": Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Romans. Munchen, 1965 (Forum Slavicum; Bd. 4 / Ed. D. Tschizewskij).

15. Grishin D. The Beliefs of Dostoevsky. Melbourne, 1963 (Twentieth Century; 1963; Vol. 17).

16. Grishin D. V. Афоризмы и высказывания Достоевского. Melbourne, 1961.

17. Katsman R. Dostoevsky's "A Raw Youth": Mythopoesis as the Dialectics of Absence and Presence (From Capital to Writing) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 85 - 95.

18. Kholodov A.B. Мифопоэтика романов Ф. М. Достоевского: диалог и контекст // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 137 - 147.

19. Kravchenko M. Dostoevsky and the Psychologists. Amsterdam, 1978.

20. Lane D. A Reading of Dostoevsky's "The Double" through the Psychoanalytic Concepts of The Self and The Other // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 1 - 11.

21. Mathews P.D. That Which Exceeds // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3-4. P. 67 - 78.

22. Mathews P., Cooke B. Dostoevsky: Expressions in Silence // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 1 - 9.

23. Melbourne Slavonic Studies. Dostoevsky Commemorative Number / Ed. S. B. Vladiv. 1980. N 14. 100 p.

24. Minney P. Dostoevsky's Dialogic Imagination and the British School of Radical Orthodoxy // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 55 - 61.

25. Nogovitsin O. Зло в христианстве и бунт Ивана Карамазова // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 63 - 72.

26. Padgett A. Beyond Dostoevsky: The Discourse of Non-Existence // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 79 - 91.

27. Rusniak L. A. Мифологическое мышление в диалогической структуре текста Достоевского ("Братья Карамазовы") // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 73 - 85.

28. Saraskina L. V. Ф. М. Достоевский и "восточный вопрос" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 87 - 102.

29. Schmid W. Der Textaufbau in den Erzahlungen Dostoevskijs. Munchen, 1973 (Beiheft zu Poetica; h. 10 / Ed. K. Maurer).

стр. 475

30. Stepanian K. A. Смерть и воскресение, бытие и небытие в романах Достоевского // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 103 - 117.

31. Stuchebryukhova O. The Subaltern Syndrome and Dostoevsky's Quest for Authenticity of Being // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 13 - 32.

32. Terrell N. Soap Bubbles and Inertia: The Underground Man's Dependence on Rhetoric, Narrative Frameworks and Scepticism as a Syndrome of Secular Idealism // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 1 - 29.

33. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review/Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2000. Vol. 1. 166 p. (Inaugural Issue.)

34. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2001. Vol. 2. 152 p. (Special Issue: Dostoevsky and the Problem of Dialogue in Contemporary European Thought / Guest Ed. N. Pecherskaya).

35. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review/Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. 228 p.

36. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review /Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2005. Vol. 5. 216 p.

37. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S. M. Vladiv-Glover. 2005. Vol. 6. 109 p.

38. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S. M. Vladiv-Glover. 2006. Vol. 7. 106 p.

39. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2007/2008. Vol. 8 - 9. 89 p.

40. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review / Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2009/2010. Vol. 10 - 11. 104 p.

41. The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review/Ed. S.M. Vladiv-Glover. 2011/2012. Vol. 12 - 13. 155 p.

42. Vladiv S. B. Dostoevsky's Major Novels as Semiotic Models // Dostoevsky Studies. 1989. Vol. 9. P. 157 - 162.

43. Vladiv S.B. Narrative Principles in Dostoevskij's "Besy": A Structural Analysis. Berne; Frankfurt am Mein; Las Vegas, 1979.

44. Vladiv S. Religious Imagery in Dostoevsky's Works // Australian Slavonic and East European Studies. 1988. Vol. 2. N 2. P. 95 - 110.

45. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Dostoevsky, Freud and Parricide: Deconstructive Notes on "The Brothers Karamazov" // New Zealand Slavonic Journal. 1993. P. 7 - 34.

46. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Dostoevsky's Major Novels as Models of Meaning // Dostoevsky Studies (Journal of the International Dostoevsky Society). 1989. Vol. 9. N 1. P. 157 - 162.

47. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Dostoevsky's Positively Beautiful Man and the Existentialist Authentic Self: A Comparison // Canadian American Slavic Studies. 1989. Vol. 23. N 3 (Fall 1989). P. 313 - 329.

стр. 476

48. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Romani Dostojevskog kao diskurs transgresijc i pozude. Belgrade, 2001. 215 p.

49. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Russia's Political Unconscious in "The Possessed": Dostoevsky's New Phenomenology of History and Representation // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 11 - 28.

50. Vladiv-Glover S. M. Сакральное в "Братьях Карамазовых": вероисповедание или феноменология сознания? // Достоевский и мировая культура: Альманах. 1999. Т. 12. С. 7 - 12.

51. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Speech and Being in "The Brothers Karamazov" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 93 - 112.

52. Vladiv-Glover S.M. The Accidental Family in "The Adolescent" and Wittgenstein's "Family Relations": The Novel as Model of Meaning // Aspects of Dostoevsky's Poetics in the Context of Literary-Cultural Dialogues / Eds. K. Kroo, G.S. Horvath, T. Szabo. Sankt-Petersburg, 2011. P. 59 - 74. (Dostoevsky Monographs Series; Vol. 3).

53. Vladiv-Glover S. M. The Body and Violence: The Subject of Knowledge in Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" // Foucault: The Legacy / Ed. by С O'Farrell. Brisbane, 1997. P. 46 - 57.

54. Vladiv-Glover S.M. The Bourgeois and Citizen Alyosha Karamazov // Australian Slavonic and East European Studies (ASEES). 1996. Vol. 10. N2. P. 165 - 167.

55. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Poetika realizma: Dostojevski, Flober, Tolstoj / Transl. into Serbian. Belgrade, 2010. 182 p.

56. Vladiv-Glover S.M. Tolstoy's Mikhailov, The Painter of Anna's Portrait, and Constatin Guys, Baudelaire's Painter of Modern Life // Facta Universitatis. Series Linguistics and Literature. 2005. Vol. 3. N 2. P. 151 - 160.

57. Vladiv-Glover S.M. What Does Ivan Karamazov "Know"? A Reading through Foucault's Analytic of the "Clinical" Gaze // Polyfunktion und Metaparodie: Aufsatze zum 175. Geburtstag von Fedor Michailovic Dostojevskij / Ed. R. Neuhauser. Dresden; Munchen, 1998. S. 189 - 207. (Dostoevsky Studies Supplements; Vol. 1).

58. Vladiv-Glover S. M. What Does Ivan Karamazov "Know"? A Reading through Foucault's Analytic of the "Clinical" Gaze // New Zealand Slavonic Journal. 1995. P. 23 - 44.

59. Woodford M. Комментарий к сну главного героя в рассказе Ф. М. Достоевского "Господин Прохарчин" // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 21 - 36.

60. Zhivolupova N. V Другой в художественном сознании Достоевского и проблема эволюции исповеди антигероя // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2001. Vol. 2. P. 37 - 53.

61. Zink A. What is Prostitution Good for: Dostoevsky, Chernyshevsky, Tolstoy and the "Woman Question" in Russian Literature // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 93 - 106.

стр. 477

62. Гришин Д. В. "Дневник писателя" Достоевского. Мельбурн, 1966.

63. Гришин Д. В. Ранний Достоевский. Мельбурн, б. д. 230 с.

64. Гришин Д. Достоевский: Человек - Писатель и Мифы. Мельбурн, 1971.

65. Живолупова Н. Исповедь антигероя: от Достоевского к Михаилу Агееву (проблема жанра) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 1 - 30.

66. Кайман Р. Между Письмом и Документом, или Критические Заметки о Жизни Знаков в "Подростке" Достоевского // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 59 - 66.

67. Тарасова Н. А. Проблема установления текста "Дневника писателя" Ф. М. Достоевского 1876 г. // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2002/2003. Vol. 3 - 4. P. 31-45.

68. Тарасова Н. А. Проблема понимания в герменевтике и текстологии (на материале рукописей Достоевского) // The Dostoevsky Journal: An Independent Review. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 33 - 46.

Orphus

© libmonster.com

Permanent link to this publication:

http://libmonster.com/m/articles/view/ИЗУЧЕНИЕ-ТВОРЧЕСТВА-ДОСТОЕВСКОГО-В-АВСТРАЛИИ-1971-2013

Similar publications: LRussia LWorld Y G


Publisher:

Libmonster OnlineContacts and other materials (articles, photo, files etc)

Author's official page at Libmonster: http://libmonster.com/Libmonster

Find other author's materials at: Libmonster (all the World)GoogleYandex

Permanent link for scientific papers (for citations):

С. ВЛАДИВ-ГЛОВЕР, ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ТВОРЧЕСТВА ДОСТОЕВСКОГО В АВСТРАЛИИ (1971-2013) // London: Libmonster (LIBMONSTER.COM). Updated: 03.12.2017. URL: http://libmonster.com/m/articles/view/ИЗУЧЕНИЕ-ТВОРЧЕСТВА-ДОСТОЕВСКОГО-В-АВСТРАЛИИ-1971-2013 (date of access: 18.11.2019).

Found source (search robot):


Publication author(s) - С. ВЛАДИВ-ГЛОВЕР:

С. ВЛАДИВ-ГЛОВЕР → other publications, search: Libmonster United KingdomLibmonster WorldGoogleYandex

Comments:



Reviews of professional authors
Order by: 
Per page: 
 
  • There are no comments yet
Publisher
Libmonster Online
New-York, United States
425 views rating
03.12.2017 (715 days ago)
0 subscribers
Rating
0 votes

Keywords
Related Articles
М. А. БАРГ. ВЕЛИКАЯ АНГЛИЙСКАЯ РЕВОЛЮЦИЯ В ПОРТРЕТАХ ЕЕ ДЕЯТЕЛЕЙ
Catalog: Political science 
13 days ago · From Libmonster Online
ЛОТАР ГАЛЛЬ. БУРЖУАЗИЯ В ГЕРМАНИИ
Catalog: Political science 
13 days ago · From Libmonster Online
In macroscopic reality, gravity is determined by mass. In microscopic reality, where the particle mass is practically zero, the rotational form of gravity acts. The rotational form of gravity is formed by means of rotating microparticles, which spin gravitational spheres around themselves, which, as in a whirlpool, attract microparticles to each other.
Catalog: Physics 
36 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
The paper covers a model of generation of fundamental forces induced by neutrino interference with other particles. Neutrinos fill up vacuum and inter-vacuum space obtaining a long-range action. Fundamental binding “proton-neutrinoselectron” has been defined and its transformation under various conditions into atom of hydrogen or neutron is studied. The paper also considers structuring of nucleus and electron atomic shell. Electron is positioned on stationary shell creating intraatomic and interatomic forces. Fundamental forces are generated due to neutrinos interference of neutron, nucleon and atom. Proposed the impact of neutrinos on origin of gravitation.
Catalog: Physics 
100 days ago · From Ualikhan Adayev
Interrelation between gravitation and acts of nature is deemed as a hard proof that the Earth gravitation is a predominant fact in this cohesion. Neutrino flow pressuring towards the Earth center on its way is forming difference abnormal zones within atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere. As a result we are exposed to such natural disasters as earthquakes, volcanoes and climatic changes. Sufficient energy to such acts may be released only due to gravitation.
Catalog: Physics 
100 days ago · From Ualikhan Adayev
Neutrino is considered the carrier of gravitation. Earth gravity is formed due to the central Earth core shielding all-penetrating neutrino flow. Neutrino penetrates the Earth interfering fusion reaction on the core surface of our planet and stops motion and pressuring. As consequence neutrino is facing gravity force forwarded to the center of our planet.
Catalog: Physics 
100 days ago · From Ualikhan Adayev
A new theory of electricity is needed, first of all, because the modern theory of electricity is built on a conduction current that does not exist in nature. And this paradox is obvious even to schoolchildren who observe currents with negative and positive charges on oscilloscopes. The modern theory of electricity is not able to clearly explain many of the mysteries of electricity. This article explains some of the mysteries that the modern theory of electricity could not explain.
Catalog: Physics 
102 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
The author of the article did not encounter a single source on the Meissner-Oxenfeld effect, where the version that this effect is explained by the presence of eddy currents in superconducting ceramics would be questioned. But, in the opinion of the author of the article, ceramics in such a state are surrounded by such gravitational fields, which, when cooled, turn into gravimagnetic fields, which, together with the gravimagnetic fields of the Earth, pull all the magnetic fields from the ceramics body.
Catalog: Physics 
125 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
Two hundred years ago, Faraday received a current with negative and positive charges, which is distributed in the layer of ether adjacent to the conductor. The one who does not know this is not worth going into the theory of electricity. The discovery is based on the realization that in the theory of electricity there is no extraneous force, instead of which an electromotive force acts, formed by the difference in electrical potentials, between the zero potential of the conductor and the negative (or positive) potential of the current source. This difference in electrical potentials creates in the circuit the force of motion of the charges. The difference of electric potentials creates a force, which may well be called Coulomb force. And then it is not clear why it was necessary to invent an outside force.
Catalog: Physics 
194 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov
According to our hypothesis, the conversion of electrons and positrons into each other occurs by replacing the charge motion vector with the opposite vector. This is explained by the fact that all elements of the electron's magnetoelectric system are opposite to all elements of the positron's magnetoelectric system. And this opposite is determined by the vector of their movement in space. Therefore, it is only necessary to change the motion vector of one of the charges to the opposite vector, so immediately this charge turns into its antipode.
Catalog: Physics 
247 days ago · From Gennady Tverdohlebov

ONE WORLD -ONE LIBRARY
Libmonster is a free tool to store the author's heritage. Create your own collection of articles, books, files, multimedia, and share the link with your colleagues and friends. Keep your legacy in one place - on Libmonster. It is practical and convenient.

Libmonster retransmits all saved collections all over the world (open map): in the leading repositories in many countries, social networks and search engines. And remember: it's free. So it was, is and always will be.


Click here to create your own personal collection
ИЗУЧЕНИЕ ТВОРЧЕСТВА ДОСТОЕВСКОГО В АВСТРАЛИИ (1971-2013)
 

Support Forum · Editor-in-chief
Watch out for new publications:

About · News · Reviews · Contacts · For Advertisers · Donate to Libmonster

Libmonster ® All rights reserved.
2014-2019, LIBMONSTER.COM is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map)


LIBMONSTER - INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY NETWORK